recLAW LLP
SRA-regulated firm
- Head office address
- Hove View contact details
- Website
- www.reclaw.co.uk
- Type of firm
- Licensed body since 09/04/2021, authorised for all legal services
- Regulator
- Solicitors Regulation Authority
- SRA number
- 814394
- Company registration
- OC433058
- Regulatory record
- Show regulatory record
We set the rules for this firm. There are benefits and protections for customers of SRA-regulated firms.
Important information
- The firm can provide all types of law, including reserved legal activities
- Everyone working in this firm must follow our rules
- If things go wrong, the firm must have insurance cover
- If things go wrong and your money is lost, our compensation fund may be able to reimburse you
- If things go wrong we may be able to get your documents and money back
These are the SRA-regulated people in this organisation.
-
Barry Cullen
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at recLAW LLP
-
Cameron Wayne Malcolm
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at recLAW LLP + 1 Others
-
Elaine Louise Scott-Rebera
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at recLAW LLP
-
Helen Claire Littlewood
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at PEOPLE LEGAL LIMITED + 1 Others
-
Matthew Joseph Moorton
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at recLAW LLP
-
Peter Selkirk Gwillam
SRA-regulated solicitor
Works at recLAW LLP
Areas of law shows the sort of work this firm does. Reserved activities lists the special legal jobs this firm can do because we regulate it as a law practice.
DECISION HISTORY
This section gives the disciplinary and regulatory decisions published under our decision publication policy.
Decision - Fined
Outcome: Fine
Outcome date: 17 April 2026
Published date: 20 April 2026
Firm details
No detail provided:
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details
recLAW LLP (the firm) was directed to pay a fixed financial penalty of £750 and costs of £150.
Reasons/basis
The firm is a licensed body whose office is at Unit 7, Hove Business Centre, Fonthill Road, Hove, BN3 6HA.
The firm was requested to provide the SRA with data in respect of its anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements.
Firms are required to respond promptly to the SRA and provide full and accurate information following a request or requirement.
The firm failed to submit data in respect of its anti-money laundering and sanctions requirements to the SRA, after the SRA asked it to do so, in breach of paragraph 3.3(a) of the Code of Conduct for Firms.
The firm failed to remedy this breach after being given notice and reasonable time in which to do so.
