Eleanor Dalzell Barber
SRA-regulated solicitor
- Authorisation
- Admitted on 15/07/2009. Annual practising certificate from 01/11/2024.
- Type of lawyer
- Solicitor
- Regulator
- Solicitors Regulation Authority
- SRA number
- 381675
- Regulatory record
- Show regulatory record
The services this person can provide and the protections for clients depend on where this person works.
DECISION HISTORY
These are the disciplinary and regulatory decisions published under our decision publication policy.
Decision - Fined
Outcome: Fine
Outcome date: 27 June 2024
Published date: 8 July 2024
Firm details
Firm or organisation at time of matters giving rise to outcome
Name: MSB Solicitors Ltd
Address(es): 1st Floor4 St. Pauls SquareLiverpoolL3 9SJ
Firm ID: 670087
Firm or organisation at date of publication
Name: POCA Solicitors
Address(es): 315C Oriel Chambers, 14 Water St, Liverpool, P2 8TD
Firm ID: 824991
Outcome details
This outcome was reached by SRA decision.
Decision details
We have fined Mrs Barber for failing to provide a specimen of breath for analysis when requested by the police.
Facts of the misconduct
On 13 July 2023, Mrs Barber was involved in a minor road traffic accident. She provided a sample of breath to the police at the roadside and was subsequently arrested and taken into custody. While in custody, Mrs Barber was asked to provide a further breath sample and refused to do so.
On 16 August 2023, Mrs Barber pleaded guilty to and was convicted of a failure to provide a specimen of breath for analysis without reasonable excuse.
She was sentenced to:
- Disqualification from driving for 17 months (reduced by 17 weeks following completion of an awareness course)
- A community service order with an unpaid work requirement of 80 hours
- Costs of £85 and a victim surcharge of £114.
It was found that:
- On 13 July 2023, Mrs Barber failed without reasonable excuse to provide a specimen of breath for analysis when requested by the police.
- In doing so, she breached Principles 1 and 2 of the SRA Principles 2019.
Reasons/basis
Decision on sanction
It was decided that a financial penalty was an appropriate and proportionate sanction. This was because Mrs Barber's conduct was serious by reference to the following factors in the
SRA Enforcement Strategy:
- Any lesser sanction would not be appropriate.
- To send a signal to those we regulate more widely with the aim of preventing similar behaviour by others.
- Some public sanction is required to uphold public confidence in the delivery of legal services.
Aggravating factors included that Mrs Barber's conduct was a wilful disregard of her regulatory obligations and she had direct control over her actions.
There were also mitigating factors, including Mrs Barber's self-report to the SRA, her guilty plea, and her expressions of remorse.
In view of the above, Mrs Barber's conduct was placed in conduct band C which has a financial penalty bracket of between 16% and 49% of her gross annual income.
Her conduct was placed in the middle of the bracket at C3 (27% of gross annual income). A discount of 25% was applied to the penalty to take account of factors including Mrs Barber's admissions and co-operation.
Mrs Barber was directed to pay a financial penalty of £5,569 and ordered to pay costs of £1,350.
SRA Principles 2019
SRA Principle 1: You act in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law, and the proper administration of justice.
SRA Principle 2: You act in a way that upholds public trust and confidence in the solicitors' profession and in legal services provided by authorised persons.